NgHype



HOME | HOW TO | JOBS | EDUCATION | TRAVEL | ENTERTAINMENT | NEWS

SEARCH CONTENTS (Use Name Or Title)



Premier League Clubs Vote In Favour Of Keeping VAR Wolves Lose Out

Advert link
Share this post

Premier League Clubs Vote In Favour Of Keeping VAR Wolves Lose Out

The Premier League will continue to use video assistant referees (VAR) next season after Wolves were the only club to vote in favour of scrapping it at Thursday’s annual general meeting.

Wolves triggered a vote on the use of VAR in the 2024-25 season after formally submitting a resolution to the Premier League in May.

In order for VAR to be scrapped, 14 of the 20 Premier League clubs needed to vote in favour of doing so.

However, BBC Sport understands Wolves failed to gain support from other clubs in the top flight.

The Premier League has come under increasing pressure to modify VAR, which was introduced at the start of the 2019-20 season.

It was reaffirmed at the meeting that semi-automated offsides will be introduced at some point in the autumn, while the Premier League confirmed in-game VAR announcements will be put in place.

The in-game announcements, which were used during the 2023 women’s World Cup, will see referees explain post-VAR decisions to supporters in stadiums.

Wolves triggered a motion after a string of decisions went against Gary O’Neil’s side last season.The Premier League has come under increasing pressure to modify VAR, which was introduced at the start of the 2019-20 season.

It was reaffirmed at the meeting that semi-automated offsides will be introduced at some point in the autumn, while the Premier League confirmed in-game VAR announcements will be put in place.

The in-game announcements, which were used during the 2023 women’s World Cup, will see referees explain post-VAR decisions to supporters in stadiums.

Wolves triggered a motion after a string of decisions went against Gary O’Neil’s side last season.

Source:- BBC


| June 6, 2024.

Tags: ,

Categories: News

0 Comments

LEAVE A COMMENT

Type Name Below

Type Comment Below

« | »